Torrance JS, Wincenciak J, Hahn AC, DeBruine LM & Jones BC (2014). The relative contributions of facial shape and surface information to perceptions of attractiveness and dominance. PLoS One, 9(10): 104451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104415

Abstract. Although many studies have investigated the facial characteristics that influence perceptions of othersí attractiveness and dominance, the majority of these studies have focused on either the effects of shape information or surface information alone. Consequently, the relative contributions of facial shape and surface characteristics to attractiveness and dominance perceptions are unclear. To address this issue, we investigated the relationships between ratings of original versions of faces and ratings of versions in which either surface information had been standardized (i.e., shape-only versions) or shape information had been standardized (i.e., surface-only versions). For attractiveness and dominance judgments of both male and female faces, ratings of shape-only and surface-only versions independently predicted ratings of the original versions of faces. The correlations between ratings of original and shape-only versions and between ratings of original and surface-only versions differed only in two instances. For male attractiveness, ratings of original versions were more strongly related to ratings of surface-only than shape-only versions, suggesting that surface information is particularly important for menís facial attractiveness. The opposite was true for female physical dominance, suggesting that shape information is particularly important for womenís facial physical dominance. In summary, our results indicate that both facial shape and surface information contribute to judgments of othersí attractiveness and dominance, suggesting that it may be important to consider both sources of information in research on these topics.

Disclaimer: The information found and the views expressed in these homepages are not the responsibility of the University of Glasgow nor do they reflect institutional policy.